<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Vinarise: Forecasting (en)</title>
<link>https://vinarise.com/en/topics/forecasting</link>
<description>Forecasts sealed before the outcome and graded after it. An election forecast here takes no side.</description>
<language>en</language>
<atom:link href="https://vinarise.com/en/topics/forecasting/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<item>
<title>In Brazil&#x27;s last three presidential runoffs, nearly all zero-vote sections were zeros for the PL side</title>
<link>https://vinarise.com/en/lab/2026/10/zero-vote-sections-2026-runoff</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://vinarise.com/en/lab/2026/10/zero-vote-sections-2026-runoff</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 10:49:36 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A study found 106 polling sections where Flávio Bolsonaro got no votes in the 2026 runoff. I rebuilt the count from the public files, compared it with 2018 and 2022, and set out what those files can and cannot show.</description>
<category>Forecasting</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>I sealed a forecast before Brazil voted. Here it is.</title>
<link>https://vinarise.com/en/lab/2026/10/brazil-2026-runoff-forecast</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://vinarise.com/en/lab/2026/10/brazil-2026-runoff-forecast</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>My model gives Flávio Bolsonaro an 85 percent chance of beating Lula. Picking the favourite was the easy part. Official result, Flávio&#x27;s share of valid votes: 48.215%. Not useful. The rule required a Brier score below a coin&#x27;s 0.25 and the result inside the 80% interval. At least one of the two failed.</description>
<category>Forecasting</category>
<category>World</category>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
